Risk assessments, security questionnaires, vendor due diligence, and RFPs are strategic initiatives for organizations managing risk across growing and interconnected supply chains. How is one questionnaire different from another, and how do you decide which ones to use? Today we compare CAIQ vs SIG, or SIG vs CAIQ if you like.
CAIQ (Consensus Assessments Initiative Questionnaire) is a questionnaire that provides a set of Yes/No questions for cloud service providers, such as Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS), Platform as a Service (PaaS), and Software as a Service (SaaS) offerings, to determine if their cloud practices are reliably secure.
The CAIQ contains just under 300 questions. It was developed by the Cloud Security Alliance, a not-for-profit organization that promotes the use of best practices for providing security assurance within cloud computing.
CAIQ provides an industry-accepted way to document what security controls exist in cloud services, increasing security control transparency and assurance. It helps cloud customers to gauge the security posture of prospective cloud service vendors, as well as easily monitor their ongoing compliance with security standards.
Its latest version has been recently combined with the Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM), comprising a cybersecurity control framework for cloud computing. The Matrix is composed of 197 control objectives that are structured in 17 domains covering all key aspects of cloud technology. This makes it a de-facto standard for cloud security assurance and compliance.
In thinking about SIG vs CAIQ, SIG (Standardized Information Gathering) is a questionnaire that gathers information from a third party vendor to determine how security risks are managed across 18 different risk domains. The questions are based on industry regulations guidelines and standards, including NIST, FFIEC, ISO, HIPAA, and PCI.
It was developed by Shared Assessments as a holistic tool for risk assessments of cybersecurity, IT, privacy, data security, and business resiliency.
There are two variants:
As more vendor security assessments are introduced, security and risk managers struggle to decide which vendor assessment frameworks to use, at which time, and for which third parties.
Using CAIQ is advised when evaluating cloud providers during the vendor risk assessment process, as it contains just under 300 questions about cloud operations and processes (IaaS, PaaS, and SaaS).
Using SIG, especially SIG Lite, is advised when evaluating vendors who have less inherent risk. It takes the high-level concepts and questions from the larger SIG assessments, distilling them down to just under 200 questions. The SIG Core library is useful for more extensive assessments.
Deciding which is the right assessment tool will depend on your organization’s vendor risk management program needs. Security questionnaires like SIG, CAIQ, CIS Controls, VSAQ, and NIST are continually updated and improved by groups of experts in cybersecurity, risk management, and compliance, reflecting new security and privacy challenges.
ThirdPartyTrust licenses the latest CAIQ and SIG versions, as well as many other industry questionnaires, and makes them available to customers via the ThirdPartyTrust platform for enterprises and third party vendors.
With TPRM by ThirdPartyTrust, your team can save countless hours developing a custom questionnaire based on the already-available SIG and CAIQ questionnaires to assess your vendors, or build one from scratch.
The tool helps you send questionnaires to vendors, improves your review process, and saves completed questionnaires to ensure they are always accessible.
Additionally, your security and GRC teams can efficiently and securely respond to any SIG or CAIQ requests that come your way by using your vendor profile (Beacon by ThirdPartyTrust).
Whether sending an assessment request to third party vendors or responding to CAIQ and SIG as a vendor yourself, ThirdPartyTrust allows your team to be proactive about security and risk mitigation.
Unpredictable vulnerabilities will be an ongoing concern for security teams inthe foreseeable future.
In this guide you will learn the fundamentals of zero days, patterns from our statistical analysis, and tips to reduce risk and remediate zero days if/when they happen.
|cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics||11 months||This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".|
|cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional||11 months||The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".|
|cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary||11 months||This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".|
|cookielawinfo-checkbox-others||11 months||This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.|
|cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance||11 months||This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".|